Hi, my 1st post, hope it is ok. My doctor said my PSA was 6.5 and free psa 14 , so sent me for the biopsy last friday. I was given 3 Levaquin to take for the biopsy. Anyhow took it easy over weekend with some fever,etc. But Sunday night my fever got up to 101.5 , Monday I called the Uroligist and they gave me 4 more Levaquin for Mon. to Thurs. My temp went to 103.3 Mon. after taking the 1st pill at noon. Got fever down after talking with the Uroligist. GOOD NEWS Tues. my biopsy results all negative. Just wondering if this has happened to anyone , Thank you for reading. Edit: i need add I'm 60 years old had no symtoms prior to biopsy, now I wonder what caused the elevated Psa
They did not find my PC until the third biopsy...Having multiple biopsies is fairly common.. Using the rectal probe, there are areas of the prostate that can not be reached by the biopsy needles..In "difficult cases" they can do a "saturation biopsy", 40 cores, done differently that finds it if it's there....
You need to KEEP wondering what is causing the elevated PSA..Take a glance any my signature..
PSA at age 55: 3.5, DRE negative.
65: 8.5, DRE " normal", biopsy, 12 core, negative...
66 9.0 DRE "normal", BPH, (Proscar)
67 4.5 DRE "normal" second biopsy, negative.
67.5 5.6, DRE "normal" U-doc worried..
age 68, 7.0, third biopsy (June 2010) positive for cancer in 4 cores, 2 cores Gleason 6, one core Gleason 7. one core Gleason 9. RALP on Sept. 3, 2010, Positive margin, post-op PSA. 0.9, SRT , HT. Feb.2011 PSA <0.1 Oct 2011 <0.1 Feb 2012 <0.01 Sept 2012 0.8 June 2013 1.1, Casodex added, PSA 0.04 10/2013. PSA 0.32 1/14. On 6/14 PSA 0.4, "T"-5. 10/14 PSA 0.6, T-11. 1/2015 PSA 0.106. 4/15. 0.4, 9/15 1.4
A positive biopsy is a definitive diagnosis. A negative biopsy means either you do not have or they did not find it this time. The advice from biopsy veterans like Fairwind and I (4 times) are you just have to watch it from now on if your PSA keep increasing.
What I learned from my 4 times is that preparation is very important to minimize infection. Often, we did not take the antibiotics precisely as prescribed or did not thoroughly clean out our bowel before the procedure. Now you know.
By the way, we are very happy to reject your membership to our club.
PCa Dx 2010 at 65. PSA increased from 2.5 in 2000 to 10.7 in 2010. Four biopsies in 6 years. Final biopsy in 2010: 1 of 12 cores 5% cancer, G6
CT, bone scans & MRI all negative
Da Vinci 8/10; nerve sparing, catheter out in 7 days; no incontinence, no ED
Post Op Pathology pT2N0Mx: organ confined; negative margins; lymph nodes & seminal vesicle not involved but PNI present; cancer extensive within prostate, multifocal G 3+3 and tertiary G 4
PSA <.1 for the past 5 years. Infected lymphocele diagnosed and treated in 2014, 4 yrs after RALP
Yeah, I don't want to rain on your parade either, but as stated above a negative biopsy could mean they just missed the tumor. Or when they sliced off a piece for the pathology report they missed it. I only had one positive core but the tumor occupied 20% of the prostate, and they did a 12 core biopsy. Plus, I had two different pathology reports, one reported 40% of one core and the other only 1% because of how they sliced it. Something's causing your numbers, you need to be aggressive until you find out for sure what. Best of luck to you.
Age 55 at Dx
PSA 1.34 10/08
PSA 1.93 04/10
PSA 4.1 10/11, Free PSA 20%
Biopsy 12/11 - One core 40%, rest negative, T1c, Gleason 3+3, Some PNI, Prostate 47.4g, PSA Density .086
RALP City of Hope/Dr. Wilson 2/15/12. Pathology: Prostate 52 grams, 20% total involvement (bilateral), N0MX,
T2c, Gleason 3+3, margins clear.
PSA continues to be undetectable.
Thanks for the replies, I thought I took the antibotics and did the fleet the morning of biopsy as instructed . ? Anyhow, I got a little sleep last night. Hope this 4 pills clears up whatever is causing my fever ,last Leviquin today. I'm self-employed and buy my Insurance.
flody1 - my temp spiked to 103.5 the night after the biopsy and I could not control body temp. I was shivering uncontrollably, even in a warm bed then bath tub. Ended up spending 3 days in the hospital with sepsus (blood infection) from e.coli in the blood. A gift of the biopsy. I'm guessing you may have an infection, but hopefully just a UTI and they can deal with it with oral antibiotics. I'm surprised the Uro only had you do a few days. If they suspect an infection, which they obviously do given they gave you antibiotics, it is usually a couple week course of meds to kill it. Watch your temp carefully after you finish the meds. If it comes back up, talk with them immediately.
Hope all is doing better for you now and it all goes away. It's nice to have that negative biopsy, and hopefully you don't have PCa. However as others have said, that elevated PSA is an indicator of something going wrong. Make sure your Uro gets to the bottom of it. You may only have a small volume of cancer and the needle biopsy did not hit the spot. At least if that is the case, it is very early and easily treatable should it show up in a biopsy in the future.
If it were me, I'd be watching that PSA closely. Do another one 3 months or at most 6 months and see if it keeps rising. No sense doing one shortly after a biopsy, it will be falsely high. I had a Medical Oncologist do one 2 weeks after biopsy and it was 8.0. All other doctors said it was a silly thing to do because it would be known to be high and of no value.
Age 49, healthy, physically very active
DRE felt nodule on right side
Free PSA 13%
Biopsy 10/24/11, Gleason 3+4, all cores positive
Pathology: T2c, Gleason 3+4, 1 mm positive margin at apex
PSA 3/9/12 - 0.01
Has your urologist mentioned anything about having an enlarged prostate? Before my PC developed, I had BPH for years, which had initially been the reason for my elevated PSA. The general rule is "the larger the prostate the higher the PSA." This is simply because the prostate creates the PSA in our bloodstreams and larger ones will naturally produce more PSA.
And, as others have suggested, a negative biopsy could simply mean that any tumors did not happen to be in the path of the biopsy needle. When I had a biopsy last August, the doctor took 20 cores (instead of the more customary 12) because my prostate was so much larger than normal. He took a cross section of cores guided by an ultrasound probe. After he finished, I asked if he saw any suspicious areas through the ultrasound images -- and he said no. I felt pretty confident after that.
But yet, my results came back malignant as 3 of the 20 cores were cancerous (all three were about 20% malignant). After surgery, I learned that my prostate was 98 grams and the tumor (only that one tumor was found in the post-op pathology) was only 2 grams. A small tumor within a very large prostate. So I guess I was lucky that my urologist was so thorough because a smaller number of cores may well have missed the tumor.
But it is still very possible that your PSA reading could be from an enlarged prostate if your doctor may have mentioned BPH to you.
In any event, future biopsies may be the best way for you to play it safe. I hate saying this, though, because I did not really enjoy the one biopsy that I had.
July 2011 Local PSA lab reading 6.4 (from 4.6 in 2009). Sept. 2011 Mayo Clinic PSA lab reading 5.7
DRE revealed no lumps, just severe BPH.
Biopsy early Aug. 2011, 3 of 20 cores cancerous (about 20% of each core).
Gleason 3+3, pT2c, NO, MX, R1 adenocarcinoma.
DaVinci prostatectomy Nov. 1, 2011.
1.0 x 0.6 x 0.6 cm mass involving right posterior inferior, right posterior apex & left mid posterior prostate.
right posterior margin involved by 0.2 cm.
first post-op PSA less than 0.10 on Feb. 13, 2012.
Last edited by HighlanderCFH; 03-21-2012 at 07:12 AM.
Reason: slight revision