A website to provide support for people who have or have had any type of cancer, for their caregivers and for their family members.
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 119

Thread: (H) Radiation Treatment

  1. #21
    [#14]
    The Impact of Exercise during Radia
    tion Therapy for Prostate Cancer on Fatigue and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [2018, Full Text]

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865417303697

    Abstract

    Background
    Radiation therapy (RT) is clinically proven to improve survival in men with prostate cancer. Despite these advantages, it is known to cause adverse effects such as fatigue. This review proposes to summarize the totality of evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the effectiveness of exercise on fatigue in men with prostate cancer as a primary outcome. Quality of life was a secondary outcome.

    Methods
    RCTs that explored the effect of exercise during RT on fatigue for men with prostate cancer were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, AMED, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ISRTCN registry. Reference lists of included studies and reviews were also examined. Trials were excluded if they included a mixed cohort of patients where data could not be extracted for prostate cancer patients alone or if the intervention took place after RT had finished. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standardized reporting guidelines were followed to ensure the standardised conduct and reporting of the research.

    Results
    The search strategy yielded a total of 278 studies, of which five met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis pooled data of 392 participants using the Cochrane Review Manager 5.3 random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird approach) with the post-test means of the control and intervention groups and associated standard deviations. Exercise was significant at alleviating fatigue when compared to the control group (standardized mean differences, −1.03; 95% confidence interval, −1.82 to −0.24).

    Conclusion
    Exercise during RT is an effective approach to alleviate fatigue in men with prostate cancer. The effect on quality of life was not significant, possibly because of considerable heterogeneity across studies.
    [Emphasis mine]

  2. #22
    [#15]
    Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study
    [2018]

    http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/10/4/116

    Abstract

    The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa who declined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled to the study and were treated with PBT following one of the following protocols: 74 Gray (GyE) with 37 fractions (fr) (74 GyE/37 fr), 78 GyE/39 fr, and 70 GyE/28 fr. The 5-year progression-free survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 97% and 83%, respectively (p = 0.002). The rate of grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity was 3.9%, and a significant increased incidence was noted in those who received the 78 GyE/39 fr protocol (p < 0.05). Grade 2 or higher acute and late genitourinary toxicities were observed in 23.5% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. Our results indicated that PBT monotherapy can be a beneficial treatment for localized PCa. Furthermore, it can preserve the quality of life of these patients. We believe that this study provides crucial hypotheses for further study and for establishing new treatment strategies.
    (See Figures also.)

  3. #23
    [#16]
    TESTOSTERONE PROFILES AFTER RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    [2018, Full Text]

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534718421799

    INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
    The impact of radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) on testosterone (T) levels is not clearly understood, although a recent study has suggested that RT may lower post-treatment T levels. The aim of this study was to examine T profiles after RT for localized PC.

    METHODS
    Population analyzed included patients undergoing RT without ADT. Inclusion criteria included: pre and post-treatment total T (TT) levels; measured using LCMS; before noon; at a single lab; followed for ≥24 months. Regression analysis was used to define predictors of >100 point TT decrease at ≥6m post-RT.

    RESULTS
    103 men were analyzed. Median (IQR) patient age & baseline TT level was 67.8 years (61, 70) and 390 ng/dL (311, 493). 48%, 30% and 17% patients had hypertension, cigarette smoking history and diabetes. Median (IQR) baseline PSA was 5.2 ng/mL (4, 7), Most had a biopsy Gleason score of 6 (49%) or 7 (46%) and pre-RT clinical stage of T1c (75%). The proportion of patients who underwent external beam radiation (EBRT) monotherapy, brachytherapy (BT) and combination of EBRT/BT: 55.3%, 26.2% and 18.4%, respectively. Median TT follow-up period was 60 months. Median TT measurements during follow-up = 3. Median TT level decreased 9.6% from baseline to 375 ng/dL at six months after radiotherapy, there was no significant decrease at other periods after RT. 21% patients at baseline had levels <300 ng/dL. Among the remaining patients, 30% had TT <300 during follow-up periods. 24.3%, 9.7% and 2.9% of patients had decreases in TT level >100, >200, >300 ng/dL from baseline respectively. Only baseline TT level was a predictor of >100 point TT decrease (p < .001).

    CONCLUSIONS
    Despite recent literature, the vast majority of patients undergoing RT for PC have minimal or no decrease in TT levels.
    (See Figure also.)

  4. #24
    [#17]
    Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Early toxicity and quality-of life results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy
    [2017, Full Text]

    http://www.thegreenjournal.com/article/S0167-8140(16)34366-3/fulltext

    Abstract

    Background and purpose
    Multi-fraction high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is safe and effective for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. Two or single fraction regimens have some radiobiological rationale. The purpose is to determine toxicity and effect on health related quality of life (HRQOL) of single fraction 19 Gy or 13.5 Gy × 2.

    Materials and methods
    Eligible patients had low or intermediate risk prostate cancer, prostate volume <60 cc, and no androgen deprivation use. 170 patients were randomized to receive either a single 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy 1 week apart. HRQOL was measured using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC), toxicity with Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 and urinary symptoms with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

    Results
    Median follow-up is 20 months. Grade 2 urinary toxicity occurred in 51% within the first 3 months and in 31% thereafter with no significant difference between treatment arms. Ten patients (6%) developed urinary retention in the acute phase, although only 4 (2.4%) required a catheter for more than 48 h. One Grade 3 acute (⩽3 months) and late (>3 months) urinary toxicity occurred. No more than 1% had any Grade 2 GI toxicity. The 2-fraction arm had a higher occurrence of grade 2 erectile dysfunction (29% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.0249) and higher IPSS scores for the first year. Mean EPIC urinary scores at 12 months decreased by 4.0 and 4.6, and sexual scores decreased by 8 and 15.9 (p = 0.035) in the single and 2-fraction arms, respectively. No change occurred in the bowel or hormonal domains.

    Conclusions
    Single 19 Gy and 13.5 Gy × 2 are both well tolerated. During the first 12 months, urinary symptoms and erectile dysfunction are more common in the 2-fraction arm.

  5. #25
    [#18]
    Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and quality of life after localized prostate cancer radiotherapy in elderly patients
    [2018, Full Text]

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890970/

    Abstract

    Introduction
    Radiotherapy can diminish quality of life (QoL) for prostate cancer patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on QoL in men aged 75 years or older treated with radiotherapy for a localized prostate cancer, and to identify predictors of reduced QoL.

    Patients and methods
    We prospectively administered a battery of geriatric (MNA, GDS, Get up and Go Test, CIRS-G, ADL, IADL, MMSE), toxicity (IPSS; IIEF 5), and QoL (QLQ C30) screening tests in 100 elderly patients before and two months after prostate cancer radiotherapy (NCT 02876237). Patients ≥ 75 years undergoing radiotherapy with a curative intent for localized prostate cancer with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADL) were eligible for study inclusion. Correlations between patient-assessed QoL and tumor characteristics, radiotherapy treatment or CGA parameters were sought using the Fisher or the Mann and Whitney tests. Changes in QoL parameters over time were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

    Results
    At study entry, scores for IADL impairments were present in 51%, reduced autonomy in activities of daily living in 16%, cognitive impairment found in 20%, depression-related symptoms in 31%, and 66% of patients had significant co-morbidities. Eight percent were judged to be at risk of fall and 2% were found to be undernourished. Severely impaired (IPSS ≥ 20) urinary function was observed in 11.2% and 13.5% of patients before and two months after completion of radiotherapy respectively. Significantly decreased QoL (> 20 points) at two months after treatment was found in 13% of patients and a moderate but clinically relevant reduction (10 to 20 points) in 17% of patients. No tumor characteristic, treatment, or oncogeriatric parameter was predictive of reduced QoL following prostate cancer radiotherapy.

    Conclusion
    Despite sometimes markedly diminished oncogeriatric parameters, prostate cancer radiotherapy was generally well tolerated in these elderly patients. We found no predictive factor to determine which patients would experience impaired quality of life following radiotherapy.
    [Emphasis mine]
    Last edited by DjinTonic; 04-22-2018 at 11:03 PM.

  6. #26
    [#19]
    Patient-reported anxiety with localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
    [2018]

    http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.52

    Abstract

    Background: Anxiety is a common aliment among elderly men. It may be negatively impacted by the diagnosis of cancer. Effective cancer treatment may alleviate anxiety. The EORTC QLQ-ELD14 (ELD14) is a validated questionnaire, which evaluates patient reported anxiety. Using the ELD14 questionnaire, this study assesses the trends in prostate cancer patient’s anxiety before and after treatment with SBRT. Methods: All patients with localized prostate cancer who received SBRT at Georgetown University Hospital from 2007 to 2016 were eligible for inclusion in this cross-sectional cohort. The ELD14 questionnaire was used to assess quality of life before and following treatment. Initially, approximately 267 patients (median age of 70) responded to the ELD14 questionnaire. This study is focused on questions related to patient’s anxiety regarding their families, future, health and end of life. The responses to these questions were grouped into three clinically relevant categories (not at all, a little and quite a bit to very much). Results: Prior to treatment, 19% of patients felt quite a bit or very much worried about their families coping with their illness. This decreased to 9% at 24 months post-SBRT (p = 0.007). Initially, 27% of patients reported concerns for the future of their families, which subsequently decreased to 20% at 24 months (p = 0.15). At initial consult, 32% of patients reported being worried about their future health. This decreased to 13% at 24 months (p < 0.001). Twenty percent of patient reported concern about their future at initial consult; this declined to 11% at 24 months (p = 0.03). And finally, self reported anxiety about end of life was 18% at the initial consult and 12% at 24 months (p = 0.16). Conclusions: Self-reported anxiety surrounding family, health and future is prevalent amongst prostate cancer patients at initial evaluation. Significant reduction in anxiety is observed in our cohort post-SBRT. Further investigations in the causes of pre and post-treatment anxiety may offer valuable insight into preventable root causes and improvement in patient’s quality of life.

  7. #27
    [#20]
    Long-term outcomes in patients younger than 60 years of age treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    [2018]

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00066-017-1238-2

    Abstract

    Purpose
    The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes and late toxicities in patients younger than 60 years of age with long-term follow-up treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

    Methods
    Between January 2000 and December 2009, 270 consecutive patients were treated with favourable localized prostate cancer; the median follow-up was 111 months (range 21–206). All patients received one implant of LDR brachytherapy. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (CTAE v4.02) by the National Cancer Institute.

    Results
    The overall survival according to Kaplan–Meier estimates was 99 (±1%) at 17 years. The 17-year rate for failure in tumour-free survival (TFS) was 97% (±1%), whereas for biochemical control it was 95% (±1%) at 17 years, 97% (±1%) of patients being free of local recurrence. No intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Acute genitourinary (GU) grade II toxicity was 4% at 12 months. No other chronic toxicity was observed after treatment. At 6 months, 94% of patients reported no change in bowel function.

    Conclusions
    LDR brachytherapy provides patients younger than 60 years of age with low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer excellent outcomes and has a low risk of significant long-term GU or gastrointestinal morbidity.

  8. #28
    [#21]
    High dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer
    [2018]

    http://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/17950

    Abstract

    High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy involves delivery of a high dose of radiation to the cancer with great sparing of surrounding organs at risk. Prostate cancer is thought to be particularly sensitive to radiation delivered at high dose-rate or at high dose per fraction. The rapid delivery and high conformality of dose results in lower toxicity than that seen with low dose-rate (LDR) implants. HDR combined with external beam radiotherapy results in higher cancer control rate than external beam only, and should be offered to eligible high and intermediate risk patients. While a variety of dose and fractionations have been used, a single 15 Gy HDR combined with 40–50 Gy external beam radiotherapy results in a disease-free survival of over 90% for intermediate risk and 80% for high risk. HDR monotherapy in two or more fractions (e.g., 27 Gy in 2 fractions or 34.5 Gy in 3) is emerging as a viable alternative to LDR brachytherapy for low and low-intermediate risk patients, and has less toxicity. The role of single fraction monotherapy to a dose of 19–20 Gy is evolving, with some con icting [conflicting?] data to date. HDR should also be considered as a salvage approach for recurrent disease following previous external beam radiotherapy. A particular advantage of HDR in this setting is the ease of delivering focal treatments, which combined with modern imaging allows focal dose escalation with minimal toxicity. Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) based planning is replacing CT- based planning as the technique of choice as it minimizes or eliminates the need to move the patient between insertion, planning and treatment delivery, thus ensuring high accuracy and reproducibility of treatment.
    Last edited by DjinTonic; 04-28-2018 at 12:53 PM.

  9. #29
    [#22]
    A Pooled Analysis of Biochemical Failure in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) or High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-B) Monotherapy
    [2018]

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27322703

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES:
    To investigate biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) in men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) treated with either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B) monotherapy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS:
    A retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 437 patients with intermediate-risk PC treated with SBRT (N=300) or HDR-B (N=137) was performed. Men who underwent SBRT were treated to 35 to 40 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions. A total of 95.6% who underwent HDR-B were treated to 42 Gy in 6 fractions. Baseline patient characteristics were compared using a T test for continuous variables and the Mantel-Haenszel χ metric or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate 5-year actuarial BRFS. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate factors associated with biochemical failure.

    RESULTS:
    The mean age at diagnosis was 68.4 (SD±7.8 ) years. T-category was T1 in 63.6% and T2 in 36.4%. Mean initial prostate-specific antigen was 7.4 (SD±3.4) ng/mL. Biopsy Gleason score was ≤3+4 in 82.8% and 4+3 in 17.2%. At a median of 4.1 years of follow-up, the BRFS rate (Phoenix definition) was 96.3%, with no difference when stratifying by treatment modality or biologically equivalent dose (BED1.5). On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.08, P=0.04) and biopsy Gleason score (hazard ratio 2.48, P=0.03) were significant predictors of BRFS.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    With a median follow-up period of 4 years, SBRT and HDR-B monotherapy provide excellent BRFS in intermediate-risk PC. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine the ultimate efficacy of these hypofractionated approaches, but they appear promising relative to standard fractionation outcomes.
    [Emphasis mine]

  10. #30
    [#23]
    The Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Hypofractionated High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in an Elderly Population: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
    [2018]

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29722660

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:
    Outcome data on radiation therapy for prostate cancer in an elderly population are sparse. The CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer) trial provides a large, prospectively collected, contemporary dataset in which to explore outcomes by age.

    METHODS AND MATERIALS:
    CHHiP participants received 3 to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 74 Gy in 37 fractions (conventional fractionation), 60 Gy in 20 fractions, or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Toxicity was assessed using clinician-reported outcome (CRO) and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Participants were categorized as aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years. Outcomes were compared by age group.

    RESULTS:
    Of 3216 patients, 491 (15%) were aged ≥ 75 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure rates between the groups aged < 75 years and ≥ 75 years for any of the fractionation schedules. In the group aged ≥ 75 years, biochemical or clinical failure-free rates favored hypofractionation, and at 5 years, they were 84.7% for 74 Gy, 91% for 60 Gy, and 87.7% for 57 Gy. The incidence of CRO (grade 3) acute bowel toxicity was 2% in both age groups. The incidence of grade 3 acute bladder toxicity was 8% in patients aged < 75 years and 7% in those aged ≥ 75 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CRO grade ≥ 2 late bowel side effects was similar in both age groups. However, in the group aged ≥ 75 years, there was a suggestion of a higher cumulative incidence of bowel bother (small or greater) with 60 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 57 Gy. Patient-reported bladder bother was slightly higher in the group aged ≥ 75 years than the group aged < 75 years, and there was a suggestion of a lower cumulative incidence of bladder bother with 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 60 Gy in patients aged ≥ 75 years, which was not evident in those aged < 75 years.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    Hypofractionated radiation therapy appears to be well tolerated and effective in men aged ≥ 75 years. The 57-Gy schedule has potential advantages in that it may moderate long-term side effects without compromising treatment efficacy in this group.

 

Similar Threads

  1. Proton Radiation vs Photon Radiation?
    By dmcook695 in forum Prostate Cancer Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-18-2016, 05:53 PM
  2. Implant seed radiation vs. External radiation ?
    By muddy123 in forum Prostate Cancer Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-22-2012, 11:31 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 01:47 PM
  4. NEW POSTER PLEASE READ-Hodgkin's Radiation or NO radiation??
    By annabell in forum Lymphoma - Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-21-2010, 12:10 PM
  5. Radiation or No Radiation?
    By bean66 in forum Pancreatic Cancer Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 12:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •